IELTS Writing Task 2 – The speeding up of life in many areas such as travel and communication
The speeding up of life in many areas such as travel and communication has negative effects on society at all levels—individual, national and global.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
You should write at least 250 words.
IELTS Writing Task 2/ IELTS Essay Sample
Sample Answer 1:
It is irrefutable that the IT revolution and faster means of travel have affected society at all
levels. However, I disagree that all these effects are negative. The society has also
benefitted enormously from this speeding up of life which in other words we can say
globalization.
At the individual level, we have more choices, more opportunities to travel, better job
prospects and more awareness and tolerance of other cultures. Due to better
communication, people are connected with their near and dear ones and distances are no
longer a barrier. There has been a fall in face-to-face communication but the social network
of friends that the young generation of today has is far more than ever before in the history
of mankind.
At the national level, countries are getting closer and the boundaries are disappearing.
Because of this fast era of today, nations are developing strong bonds doing successful trade
with each other. The rich nations are opening Multi National Companies in developing
countries and thus providing job opportunities to millions. This is narrowing the gap
between the rich and the poor. No doubt the people working in such companies are
underpaid but it is definitely better than being unemployed. Because of this the economies
of the poor countries are improving.
At the global level, nations are joining hands to fight evils such as poverty, disease, terrorism
and global warming. Who has not heard of the Kyoto Protocol. The major feature of the
Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European
community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions .
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, the accelerating pace of life has both negative
as well as positive effects. However, the positive effects are much more than negative
effects.
Model Answer 2:
One problem opponents of such speeding up often propose is that individuals bearing fast-pace of life today could lead to psychological diseases. For instance, business people are supposed to reply emails or telephones in a short time compared to dealing snail mails in the past. Time pressure could cause tension, hurting psychological conditions in the long term. However, tension is not as much as people might think because advanced technology allows people to do things in a short time rather than having them work overtime. Besides, the other side is that business people can also expect quick reply from others, which is conducive to their own business, too.
Another hazard at the national and international level often being criticized is the environmental pollution. This means airplanes and cars today(which help speed up travelling) emit more CO2, which could destroy Ozone layer and is responsible for greenhouse effect. However, this assertion has some problems. It should not be neglected that visual conference on the internet—a result of speeding up in communication area—has considerably reduced the number of international meetings face to face, that means, less travelling.
Such speeding up has some benefits. To begin with, it improves individuals’ efficiency and help to increase a country’s GDP. It is because people could do more work in less time today, producing more revenues for businesses, thereby enhancing a country’s economic power. Moreover, it helps to improve international exchange and communication. People can easily get the latest information worldwide including those from faraway regions, which is beneficial for international understanding.
To conclude, the speeding up of life in travel and communication areas brings more benefits than drawbacks to individuals, nations and international societies.
It is irrefutable that the IT revolution and faster means of travel have affected society at all levels. However, I disagree that all these effects are negative. The society has also benefited enormously from this speeding up of life which in other words we can say globalization.
At the individual level, we have more choices, more opportunities to travel, better job prospects and more awareness and tolerance of other cultures. Due to better communication, people are connected with their near and dear ones and distances are no longer a barrier. There has been a fall in face-to-face communication but the social network of friends that the young generation of today has is far more than ever before in the history of mankind.
At the national level, countries are getting closer and the boundaries are disappearing. Because of this fast era of today, nations are developing strong bonds doing successful trade with each other. The rich nations are opening Multi National Companies in developing countries and thus providing job opportunities to millions. This is narrowing the gap between the rich and the poor. No doubt the people working in such companies are underpaid but it is definitely better than being unemployed. Because of this the economies of the poor countries are improving.
At the global level, nations are joining hands to fight evils such as poverty, disease, terrorism and global warming. Who has not heard of the Kyoto Protocol? The major feature of the Kyoto Protocol is that it sets binding targets for 37 industrialized countries and the European community for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, the accelerating pace of life has both negative as well as positive effects. However, the positive effects are much more than negative effects.
Model Answer 4:
There is no denying the fact that our life is speeding up in many aspects such as travel and communication.Many people worried that it has negative effects on society at all levels – individual, national and global. As far as I am concerned, it has distinct effects on these 3 levels, for the following reasons.
Firstly, accelerating our life is harmful to individuals.This is mainly because that it is intolerant for people living under huge pressure on both mentally and physically. A recent survey illustrates that three more times number of people suicide for bankrupt or unemployment than that of 10 years ago. Furthermore, to get used to fast lifestyle,people have to give up the traditional cooking,and grab the Mc Donal’s instead. In fact,junk food saves our time while shorten our lives.
Secondly, nations will benefit from the speeding up of life. Fast travelling and communication make the society operate effectively and efficiently. Thereby nations become richer.For example, it took about 6 days by ship to export 5 tons of apples from China to Singapore,but all we need is 4 hours by air transport.As result,government will try harder to quicken out life,for time is money.
Finally, the speeding of lige is a double edged sword regarding the global.In the one hand,the faster people spin, the more global economy is stimulated. Thus it speeds up globalization. In another hand, globalization is badly threatening the environment. We have to keep the fast development under surveillance and regulated by authorities. Unless we are returned by some more natural disasters such as tsunami and earthquakes.
All in all, from what mentioned above,we can draw a conclusion that althrough speeding up of lige has lots of negtive effects on society, I tend to think that we can still take some advantages from that.
Submit your Essay here in the comment section, we will add your essay in our post.
(Collected; Source: Internet)
